Timestalkers (1987)

Dir: Michael Schultz
Star: William Devane, Lauren Hutton, Klaus Kinski, John Ratzenberger

timestalkersThis TV movie first aired on CBS in March 1987, and more or less combines two standard Kinski tropes: mad scientist and black-hearted gunslinger. Things kick off when history professor and Western enthusiast Scott McKenzie (Devane) buys an old photo, and realizes that the 1886 image contains a man wielding a .357 Magnum – a gun which dates from almost a century after the photo was taken. He writes a paper on the picture, challenging his class to come up with a solution, and is subsequently visited by Georgia Crawford (Hutton).

She reveals that she is a time-traveler from 600 years into the future, and is hunting the man in the picture, Dr. Joseph Cole (Kinski). He worked with her father inventing the time-travel device, but when Crawford tried to stop him from changing history, Cole stole the device and vanished – it now appears, going back to 1886. What exactly was his purpose? Bipping back and forth in time, Scott and Georgia try to figure that out, and how to stop Cole before he can carry out his plan to alter the future by changing the past.

As with most films about time-travel, it’s best not to stare too closely at the plot, because the paradoxes that result are almost insurmountable. [Spoilers follow, as a necessary result] If Cole is going back to kill the ancestor of the man who helped invent the time-travel gizmo, doesn’t that mean it won’t be invented? If that’s the case, how could Cole then go back in time to begin with? Also, why bother going back 700 years? That’s like trying to stop Hitler by finding his ancestor in 12th-century Germany. Why not just pop back a week and poison Crawford’s coffee? And don’t even get me started on the ending, which can only by explained by a complete and willful ignorance of the works of Ray Bradbury. Let’s just say, I doubt it turns out well.

That’s a little disappointing, considering this was written by Brain Clemens, who is quite a renowned figure in genre media. He wrote the original pilot for The Avengers (younger readers: the seminal 1960’s TV series, not the PPV comic-book franchise) and also wrote and directed Captain Kronos: Vampire Hunter, one of the more under-rated entries in the late Hammer horror canon. Here, he may have been limited, since he’s supposedly working from a source story – Ray Brown’s The Tintype, though I add the caveat since I’ve been unable to find out any significant information regarding it, or indeed Brown, who has no Wikipedia entry or even other IMDB credits.

timestalkers2This definitely appears to have been influential on a number of later, larger works: the most obvious are Timecop, with one batch of time-travellers, trying to stop another from screwing up the timeline, and Back to the Future, Part III, which also focused on time-travel to the Old West. However, those wouldn’t be released for another seven and three years respectively, so let’s give Timestalkers credit where it’s due. On the other hand, there are a few elements that are horribly dated: most obvious is a sequence where they visit another Old West collector, seeking information. He hauls a song out of his database, and plays it for them, accompanied by 16-bit graphics that may have been cutting-edge in 1987, but are now wrist-cuttingly awful.

Casting Kinski in a TVM is a bit like the cops sending a battalion of tanks to handle a domestic dispute: it’s simply overkill, considering the amount of restraint required for the medium. Whether by chance or design, Kinski doesn’t actually get to interact much with the other main characters. There’s an argument with his colleague Crawford that certainly demonstrates Klaus’s fire, but for much of the rest of the time, he’s roaming the 19th century on his quest, all by himself. However, he does get to do a decentish Travis Bickle impersonation, staring into the mirror, and in story terms, I liked how he gets into an army base, by traveling back to before it was built, passing through where security will be, then coming back. I also enjoyed the scene in which Cole pulls off a carjacking that would look impressive in Grand Theft Auto V, shoving the owner out the door as it whizzes along, with a cheery “Thanks for the lift, mister.”

Actually, that quote provides a fairly appropriate summary of the film as a whole. It whizzes along, zipping from century to century in such a way that the flaws are somehat hidden, before coming to a moderately-exciting climax as the US President heads through the desert, and right into an ambush. This is where McKenzie’s Western-style training – none too subtly foreshadowed early, while the plot is ambling its way towards significance – pays off, though I do have to question his convenient, Annie Oakley-esque accuracy while on horseback, which is not addressed during the previous going. That’s the main flaw here: a script definitely in need of at least a couple more rewrites before being ready from prime-time, particularly occupying such a logically dangerous area as time-travel.

But by the low standards of made-for-television movies, I’ve seen much worse, and the performances are better than you normally get in such things. Devane sells the concepts involved with enough enthusiasm to convince the audience, if they’re prepared to squint a little bit, although former model Hutton is less than entirely convincing as A Scientist. Kinski is perfectly fine as an evil antagonist, but you certainly don’t get the sense he was taxed or challenged by anything here, although at least I could locate no reports of issues or problems during filming. The film is currently on Youtube. I can’t say how long it might last, but it has been up since February this year, and would seem to have a decent shot as surviving, so here you go…

Creature (1985)

titanfindDir: William Malone
Star: Stan Ivar, Wendy Schaal, Lyman Ward, Klaus Kinski
a.k.a. Titan Find, The Titan Find

“Klaus Kinski is dead now, and the world is a better place for it.”
— William Malone

This combines elements from both Alien (1979) and The Thing (1982) – and it wasn’t the first time Malone had gone to the former well, a couple of years previously having put together Scared to Death, about a monster that lives in the Los Angeles sewer system, coming up at night to suck spinal fluid out of people [as you do…] And in 2000, he’d complete the trilogy of Alien knockoffs with Supernova. But it’s Creature, whether under that name or Titan Find, with which most people are likely familiar.

The movie starts on Titan with the discovery of an alien in a capsule, which – to no-0ne’s surprise except the two poor slobs who find it – turns out not to be dead. One has his head explodes inside his spacesuit, and the other, apparently driven insane, flies back to Earth and rams his craft into an orbiting space-station. The final frontier has become the property of corporations in this future, specifically the American NTI and German company Richter Dynamics. The Americans send a ship out to Titan to find out what happened to the first expedition: there’s the captain (Ivar), corporate boss (Ward), engineering type (Schaal) and a “security officer” (Diane Salinger), who doesn’t speak to anyone else, even though they wonder why on Earth/Titan they would need one of those.

On their arrival, it becomes clear. Richter has also sent a ship, and have already landed. NTI’s craft sets down too, but it’s more of a “crash”, leaving their vessel crippled, running out of oxygen. Heading over, they discover a number of dead bodies, and their craft is visited by Hans Rudy Hofner (Kinski), the last survivor of the 20+ members of the German expedition. He informs them that what was discovered was an alien’s collection of life-forms, like a child’s butterfly collection, except a great deal more lethal. The particular creature they’re up against has the ability to take over the bodies of its victims and use them to lure in further prey, as well as generate visions that serve the same purpose.

You can probably work out the rest of the plot from there: the creature gnaws its way through the minor members of the cast, working his way up to the front of the credits, while they try to figure out a way to defeat it. Interestingly, the method eventually used is directly inspired – the film only stops short of mentioning its name – by 1951’s The Thing From Another World, based on the same source SF novel as The Thing. There are the usual false endings where the survivors are probably the only people who believe the creature has been killed (the viewer likely having checked their watch and realized there are still 20 minutes left), but to its credit, the story ties itself up more or less neatly, without having to resort to cliches like a final shot of an alien egg.

As a B-movie, this isn’t terrible: the main problem is that the two films from which it most obviously borrows, were both far superior in just about every way. Some of the effects crew supposedly went on to work on Aliens, and from a technical standpoint, it’s pretty respectable, considering the budget was less than three-quarter of a million dollars. There’s a very good exploding head scene, and plenty of prosthetic effects, but the creature is too blatantly a man in a rubber suit to provoke more than snorts of derision. The other performances are mostly forgettable: Diane Salinger, who played security officer Bryce, perhaps comes off best, simply because she has least to say, and the script is probably the film’s weakest link. Witness the thoroughly ludicrous explanation she offers for her absence toward the end, which is something an 11-year-old child would have rejected as implausible.

This is, extremely obviously, one of those roles which Kinski took for the money, but as usual, even if his motivation may have been mercenary, he’s good value in it. Particularly, keep an eye out for the scene, as noted and broken down by Du Dumme Sau in detail, where Klaus apparently acts and has lunch at the same time (below). Very considerate that, on a tight shooting schedule.

klaus_kinski_vs_sandwich

If Kinski’s role feels like a bit of an afterthought, that’s for the very good reason that it apparently was: “During the production they got more money – and the producers suddenly hired Klaus Kinski, even if there wasn’t a part for him in the movie, so Malone and screenwriter Alan Reed had to invent a character.” By Malone’s account, communication between director and actor largely consisted of screaming from both sides, which appeared to work best for both of them. The quote opening this review came from a 1999 interview Malone did with Fangoria, and it’s perhaps worth quoting some more of the director’s thoughts.

“Kinski was the craziest person I’ve ever met. I had him for a week on that picture, out of a seven-week shoot. I remember the first words out of his mouth. He put his arm around me on the set and said, ‘You know, Bill, when Nastassja was 12, I raped her.’ And things went downhill from there…. “

In the light of subsequent events – albeit involving Klaus’s other daughter, Pola – that’s an extremely unfortunate statement, though of course, Kinski was well known for behaving outrageously, purely  for shock purposes.  Malone’s opinion did seem to mellow subsequently, later saying: “He was a funny guy, and I think he would be happy I said the world was a better place without him. He reveled in that kind of thing.” Salinger also has some interesting stories of working with Klaus on the film, but overall, appears to remember him fondly, saying:

“Klaus taught me a great deal! We were wearing these padded, quilted space suits, and he taught me how to act [in them] with my back. I knew he was brilliant, but he would never hit his marks. He was basically ‘Fuck you, I’m the actor, you’re the camera. I’m not gonna follow you, you follow me.’ I remember Bill [Malone] saying to me that a lot of the great, brilliant footage that he had of Klaus he couldn’t use, because he was out of focus.”

The movie was re-released on DVD earlier this year, in a nicely letterboxed version: the copy I saw was streamed on Netflix, in a 4:3 ratio, and was probably too dark. The DVD comes with Malone’s commentary, as well as interviews with the surviving cast members, both of which I would be very interested to hear, so I’ll update this one if I get hold of it.

Cobra Verde (1987)

Dir: Werner Herzog
Star:
Klaus Kinski, Jose Lewgoy, King Ampaw, Salvatore Basile

In most of the other films, the character Kinski plays is out there: clearly orbiting a different star in terms of sanity. That’s perhaps less the case here, once the film hits its stride, at least. He plays the titular bandit, real name Francisco Manoel da Silva. He’s hired as a slave overseer on a Brazillian sugar-cane plantation, but incurs the wrath of the owner after impregnating three (!) of his daughters. To get rid of the outlaw, the owner ships Mr. Verde off to Dahomey to acquire more slaves, in the belief that it’s a suicide mission. Certainly, the ruined fort which he takes over on arrival does not bode well, or the story told by the sole survivor of the previous garrison.

However, once Francisco settles in there, it turns out he’s far from the most differently-sane person – not least the king, who is definitely a couple of sandwiches short of a picnic, taking advice from his invisible friend. da Silva finds success there, delivering the slaves, but after discovering the king’s insanity first-hand, teams up with the son who wants to take over from his father, even though he has not exactly fallen far from the tree. The Cobra recruits an army of women warriors and helps with the coup, only to find his new life shattered when Brazil abolishes slavery. Proceedings end, in typical Herzog/Kinski fashion, with a broken hero trying to drag a boat back into the water, and rolling around in the surf, howling hysterically.

To misquote a proverb, in the land of the bat-shit crazy, Klaus Kinski is king, and that’s the case here. His character fits the Dahomey society like a glove, whether it’s helping his slaves in their work – they adopt a remarkably casual approach to the shrieking madman in their midst – or training a battalion of topless female soldiers in the finer points of spear-chucking. It has to be said, there are probably more bouncing breasts in this than the entire cinematic output of Fred Olen Ray – or, more appropriately, of National Geographic news-reels.

But, in terms of performances, I liked this one better than some of his more renowned work: I’d probably put it above Nosferatu, for instance (which, as noted above, is an undeniable chore), almost entirely on the strength of Kinski’s facial expressions. These communicate as much in a single look, as many less talented actors struggle to put over with an entire Tarantino of verbiage, and it’s just captivating: there have been occasional “looks” in the preceding films, but here, they’re in full effect. and you could probably put together a great montage of clips from this alone, of Kinski staring at the insanity unfolding around him.

In wonderfully Herzog-esque style, the mad King Bossa Ahadee of Dahomey, is played by a real African monarch, the wonderfully-named His Honor the Omanhene Nana Agyefi Kwame II of Nsein – it’s a village in Ghana, and based on the performance here, is entirely aptly named. He’s so convincingly out of his gourd, that it’s a shame it appears to have been his only screen credit, though I suppose the market for lunatic monarchs of colour is probably a somewhat limited one. Still, if you manage to make Klaus Kinski look sane and normal with your acting debut, you’re clearly doing something right in terms of your performance.

This would be Kinski’s last collaboration with Herzog – he’d die four years after its release, having made only two films, both nearly unwatchable (Nosferatu in Venice and Paganini). It seems to have gone about as well as the preceding four, going by Klaus’s comments.

I wish Herzog would catch the plague, more than ever. He was even more helpless, more stupid and at the same time more persistent against me, than he was in the last four films, I shot with him. Although he urgently needed my help, and pretended, he would kiss my ass for that, he did the opposite behind my back. The people from Ghana are friendly and peaceful. Herzog knew, how to use them for his purpose. I knew his criminal and enslaving methods since Peru, where he always went for the most helpless and where I eventually called him Adolf Hitler. In Ghana he excelled himself.

Yep, Kinski just Godwin’s Law’d himself.

Fitzcarraldo (1982)

Dir: Werner Herzog
Star:
Klaus Kinski, Paul Hittscher, Huerequeque Enrique Bohórquez, Claudia Cardinale

As an appetizer, we watched Les Blank’s documentary, Burden of Dreams, which chronicles the early stages of filming, from the initial attempts with Jason Robards as Fitzcarraldo and Mick Jagger (!) as his sidekick, through the initial camp, burned to the ground by disgruntled locals, and on through the reshoot after Robards came down with amoebic dysentery and Jagger went off to tour. Not that this exactly went swimmingly, as the shoot continued to present problems: the bulldozer used to clear the way needed parts flown in from Miami, there were delays due to attacks from another tribe up-river, and this is probably one of the few films with whores officially on the payroll [Charlie Sheen movies don’t count].

What that film brings out are perhaps the similarities between Herzog the director and Fitzcarraldo the subject, both consumed with an idea that many would conceive as ludicrous, and determined to plough on with it, whatever the cost. You can visibly see Herzog disintegrate over the course of filming, though it’s disappointing that the documentary stops before the director succeeds in pulling off the ‘money shot’ of seeing a 300-ton boat pulled up a forty-degree hill. It’s almost as if Blank is more interested in failure than success, though it’s still worth seeing, purely for Herzog going off on a rant about the jungle:

Kinski always says it’s full of erotic elements. I don’t see it so much erotic. I see it more full of obscenity. Nature here is vile and base. I wouldn’t see anything erotical here. I would see fornication and asphyxiation and choking and fighting for survival and growing and just rotting away… The trees here are in misery, and the birds are in misery. I don’t think they – they sing. They just screech in pain… It’s like a curse weighing on an entire landscape. And whoever… goes too deep into this has his share of this curse. So we are cursed with what we are doing here… We have to become humble in front of this overwhelming misery.

Crack open those Joy Division LPs, folks. What the documentary does soft-pedal, is the stormy relationship between Kinski and Herzog. While perhaps not as bad as during Aguirre, Herzog subsequently said that the natives who were part of the cast, offered at one point to kill Kinski, so disturbed were they by his anger. Werner, however, had learned that letting Klaus’s fury burn itself out was more productive than trying to engage his star. Some of this tactic can been in the footage below, from My Best Fiend, which shows what happens when Kinski goes off. All Blank shows, is Kinski growling about the ‘fucking stinking’ camp, so one wonders why Blank chose to relegate to an out-take, this outburst…

That said, Kinski probably smiles more here than he did in almost any other of the 200+ movies in which he appeared, which is an unnerving sight. He plays opera lover and former railway engineer Brian Sweeney Fitzgerald, known locally as Fitzcarraldo, who wants to bring Enrico Caruso to the jungle. To raise money, he spots an opening in the rubber business: a tract of land left unexploited because of the rapids which prevent a boat from going upstream far enough to reachi it. Fitzcarraldo sees that it might be possible to take a nearby river to a point where only a relatively short stretch of hilly country separates it from the river he wants to reach. Haul your boat over that hill, and you can then use it to harvest its rubber.

As noted, it hard to say what’s madder: Fitzcarraldo’s plan, or Herzog’s plan to re-enact it without miniatures, CGI or blue-screen, instead opting to drag a full-scale boat over a 100% actual hill [while inspired by a true story, the real boat was both one-tenth the size, and dismantled into pieces]. On the way, he loses most of his crew, who are unnerved by the local tribesmen, but gets another crew in the shape of said tribesmen, after countering the tribal drumming with his gramophone and opera records. [The resulting audio mash-up is like Caruso jamming with Adan & the Ants.] Fortunately, they have a myth about a white god and his ship, and Fitzcarraldo convinces them that dragging his boat over the hill is part of that. Unfortunately, it’s only part of that…

You often hear of life imitating art, but it’s these parallels between the movie and the making of the movie that give this such resonance: rarely have the two been so close. Both Fitzcarraldo (as played by Kinski) and Herzog (as portrayed by Herzog) are dreamers, obsessed with the grandest of meaningless gestures. They are both prepared to go to any lengths, and make any sacrifice, to achieve their goal, even when simpler means of achieving the same ends would suffice. You can only admire the tenacity, at the same time as you shake your head at the folly – then there’s a scene, where Fitzcarraldo and crew are up a tree, looking at the scope of what they have to do, and you appreciate exactly why Herzog went the extra 1,500 miles or so.

Outside of Kinski, there aren’t much in the way of performances – nobody is given much to do, except trail around the jungle in Fitzcarraldo’s wake. These aren’t so much supporting characters as superfluous ones, but it doesn’t matter much. This is the kind of film that should be in the dictionary beside the word “auteur,” because it’s clear that this was made by a man driven by a vision, rather than, as we so often see these days, the lure of a paycheck.

Woyzeck (1979)

Dir: Werner Herzog
Star:
Klaus Kinski, Eva Mattes, Wolfgang Reichmann, Willy Semmelrogge

Filming on this started a mere five days after the completion of principal photography on Nosferatu, with most of the same crew, but the stylistic approach – there are a lot of long scenes, shot in a single take – allowed it to be finished in 18 days. Herzog had originally planned to use Bruno S, the star of Herzog’s earlier The Enigma of Kaspar Hauser, in the title role, but changed his mind and switched to Kinski. It’s based on a stage play by Georg Buchner, who left the work incomplete at his death – its resulting open-ended state has led to a number of playwrights and film-makers taking it on.

The central character is a soldier, who is already skating on mentally thin ice as we first see him, shaving his superior officer (Reichmann) with a cut-throat razor, and musing on the nature of life – not unlike Alfred Doolittle in My Fair Lady, Woyzeck claims morality is a luxury, not available to the poor like him. To make ends meet, so he can live with his common-law wife, Marie, (Mattes) and their young child, he also volunteers as human guinea-pig in the dubious experiments of a local doctor (Semmelrogge). These include living on nothing but peas for months at an end, a diet which isn’t exactly helping Woyzeck’s stability, who is hearing voices from the ground. Never a good sign…

The tipping-point, however, is the realization that Marie may be having an affair with another soldier, higher in rank and – let’s be honest – physical appeal, charm and sanity, while he’s at it. This sends Woyzeck right over the edge, and he stabs her to death while they’re out on a walk. He takes refuge in a local inn, though his blood-stained appearance gives him away. The film ends with the discovery of Marie’s body, and a final caption, stating that it’s been some time since they’ve had such a good murder. I suppose this is some kind of spoiler, but it’s in such little doubt that this is where the movie is heading, that it barely counts.

There are some things that are more fun to experience directly, than watch someone else do. Play video games is one; take drugs another (as The Trip shows – one of only a few movies I’ve ever walked out on). Go insane is probably in the same category, going by this, which consists of not much more than 80 minutes of Kinski pulling faces and burbling absurdist nonsense – the rest of the cast shares more in the latter than the former – witness the story Marie tells to the local children, for example. But how much of this is Herzog, and how much Buchner, remains uncertain. The origins on the stage are certainly extremely obvious, with Herzog apparently yelling “Action!”, then wandering off for a coffee – or, indeed, going by the length of some takes, dinner and a show.

Occasionally, this does work magnificently: the final killing is up there with Psycho, in terms of being horrific without showing anything to speak of. Its impact is mostly due to the single shot, languidly approaching three minutes, of Woyzeck’s face as this tortured soul realizes that he has just killed the only person apparently capable of loving him to any degree. But the overall results are well on the mediocre side: it’s never made clear what exactly Herzog is trying to say. Is Woyzeck the helpless victim of a callous and class-ridden society? [The play generally appears to lend itself to a fairly Marxist reading] Or is this simply a glimpse into the tormented mind of someone who is only marginally functioning, in a 19th-century version of ‘care in the community’? There’s just not enough of a compelling narrative to make this more than occasionally interesting.

woyzeck

Nosferatu the Vampyre (1979)

Dir: Werner Herzog
Star:
Klaus Kinski, Isabelle Adjani, Bruno Ganz, Roland Topor

I’ll confess, I have never been able to get through this one without falling asleep, and always feel guilty about dozing off. It possesses a very languid sense of pacing, unfolding at the pace of an unmanned sailboat drifting into dock – one of the most memorable sequences depicts exactly that. Quite often, I found myself urging the film to get on with it, as in the trip by Jonathan Harker (Ganz) from the local village up to Dracula’s castle, which appear to unfold in real time. Still, asking Herzog to hurry up is a pointless exercise – it’s not what he does.

There’s certainly a wonderful sense of atmosphere, right from the opening shot which pans along a series of what you first think are dolls, only to eventually realize they are actual mummified corpses [victims of a cholera epidemic in 1830’s Mexico, filmed by Herzog – the cemetery was also used as a location in El Santo contra las momias de Guanajuato]. When you see Kinski’s Dracula, it’s an incredibly-creepy sight, even if you wonder why Harker completely fails to notice the fangs and claws which his real-estate client is sporting.

It is, very much, a loving homage to F.W. Murnau’s original, though the expiration of copyright allows Herzog to use the actual names of the characters, rather than, as Murnau did, make them up in a (failed) attempt to avoid a lawsuit. The make-up is almost identical, not just on the vampire, but on Lucy Harker (Adjani), who has the same pasty-pale pancake on her face and perpetually-concerned expression as Ellen Hutter in the original – see the illustration on the left. Indeed, sometimes the only way to tell her and Dracula apart is to look for the pointy teeth.

The relationship between Kinski and Herzog on this one was relatively peaceful, helped by the chore of getting the lead ready for his close-up. “If Kinski would start a tantrum, it would be four hours of make-up again,” said Herzog, a prospect which apparently kept Klaus reined-in. There were more problems with the thousands of rats which were needed by Herzog. The Dutch city of Delft, having just dealt with a rodent infestation, was unimpressed by the idea of letting large numbers roam their city. Additionally, the laboratory rats bought were white, and needed to be dyed: they responded to the process by licking themselves clean.

While Kinski is great at capturing the tortured angst of an immortal soul, who yearns for death as an escape from his loveless existence, it’s too restrained to be truly effective. Kinski is at his best when he’s not constrained, when there is a sense of him being unleashed in front of the camera. Here, it’s more a sense of someone who is tired of everything, who can barely be bothered to go through the motions any more, and completely lacking in passion. If that makes him a somewhat tragic figure, it’s not one in whose company you want to spend much time.

Aguirre, the Wrath of God (1972)

Dir: Werner Herzog
Star:
Klaus Kinski, Helena Rojo, Ruy Guerra, Del Negro

Werner Herzog almost didn’t get out of this one alive – and that wasn’t even anything to do with Kinski. While location scouting, a change in itinerary meant he was taken off the passenger list of a plane at the last minute: it crashed in the jungle, killing almost all those on board [the sole survivor was the subject of his later documentary, Wings of Hope]. He didn’t take the hint, and persevered with what must have been an absolute nightmare of a shoot. The opening shots, of the Spanish conquistadors struggling their way down a mountain and through the jungle give some hint of what it must have been like, even with a small crew, dealing with a jungle where water levels could change by 15 feet overnight, flooding intended locations. Even for the early seventies, a budget of less than $400,000 was still remarkable.

This was the first Herzog/Kinski collaboration – they’d known each other since Klaus had been another tenant in the boarding house where Werner lived as a teenager, and the actor had made a lasting impression. Herzog said of the Aguirre role, “The moment I finished [the screenplay], I knew it was only Kinski,” and from virtually the first shot, of Kinski glowering insanely from under the brow of his armour, show precisely why the choice was an impeccable one. Impeccable, if not easy: in the DVD commentary, Herzog tells of Kinski firing his rifle into the extras’ hut, after their late-night noise disturbed him. There was another incident, where Kiinski threatened to leave the production, only staying after Herzog threatened to shoot them both, though the urban legend about the actor being directed at gunpoint seems untrue.

The film was originally shot in English, as the only common language of the cast and crew. However, that soundtrack proved unusable, and so was replaced by a German-language one in post-production. The voice of Aguirre is not Kinski: he demanded too much money for the additional work, and Herzog went with another actor. I also note the more than slight resemblance between Cecilia Lopez, the actress playing Aguirre’s daughter, and Klaus’s daughter, Nastassja, who would have been ten or 11 at the time this was made. The incestuous undertones between the two are pretty clear, and also reflect some of the claims – for which he was sued – about his relationship with Nastassja.

Herzog did want a more restrained portrayal of Aguirre than Kinski, and to get what he wanted, would provoke the actor into a rage, wait for it to blow itself out, and then shoot the scenes, with his lead now in the quiet, calm place desired. This reaches its apex in the single shot which sums up, not only Aguirre’s insanity, but perhaps the nature of the Herzog/Kinski collaboration. Near the end, the raft is inhabited mostly by corpses, Aguirre and hundreds of monkeys. The leader grabs a monkey as he staggers around hie “empire”, now reduced to ruins, and proclaims himself the wrath of God, before tossing the monkey to one side with a gesture that is the most beautiful embodiment of insanity you will ever see. Note the monkey shitting itself at 0:23. Can’t blame it: I’d do the same if Kinski had me by the rib-cage.

It’s interesting to note how little Aguirre is present at the center in the early stages. He’s there, on the fringes, simply waiting his chance, as the advance party of the expedition, under Don Pedro de Ursúa (Guerra), struggles down the river, disintegrating with an irresistible relentlessness. When the moment is finally right, he strikes, taking control of the group and driving it onward. From that point on, everyone is doomed, and it appears that, with the exception of Aguirre, everyone knows it and are simply playing out the inevitable. It’s Shakespearean tragedy, with a man destroyed by his own weaknesses – if Hamlet or Macbeth had been a total loony at the start of the play.

As things degenerate, the only consistent point in the landscape is Aguirre, whose insanity gradually become the norm rather than the exception: “Little mother, two by two, wafts the wind in my hair,” muses one soldier as he hangs Don Pedro. Shortly thereafter, Pedro’s wife wanders off into the jungle, wearing a gown more befitting a royal ball. The survivors see a ship, stuck in the top of a tree, but deny its existence as a mirage. They may or may not be right there, but they are certainly wrong with respect to the undeniably real arrows which strike them out of the jungle.

It’s deliberately paced, things decaying at the speed of the jungle reclaiming an abandoned outpost – there’s no hurry, because it’s not going anywhere. There’s not even any need to dot every i: a rescue party sent to help a raft stuck on the far side of the river simply vanishes into the jungle, their fate undocumented but still absolutely certain. Aguirre, as portrayed by Kinski, is similar: he’s not “evil” in any real sense, and condemning him for his behaviour has about as much point as telling the jungle off. They are both forces of nature, and will do exactly what they want. You’d better not get in the way.