Location Africa (1987)

Dir: Steff Gruber
Star: Werner Herzog, Klaus Kinski, Steff Gruber, Peter Berling

We have quite a particular situation here. In this century we’ve had perhaps two or three people of Kinski’s calibre. There’s no-one else like him. He’s a wonder of the world. And this wonder can still be seen… There’s a duty, a great duty over me, since no-one else can do it. I have to be able to take it on. I want to be a good soldier of cinema.

Werner Herzog, to Steff Gruber

Documentaries involving Kinski are typically enthralling, simply because of the mercurial nature of the man. At any point, the volcano which is Klaus can potentially go off, delivering the kind of content which is gold to film-makers. But comparing this, about the making of Cobra Verde, to its most obvious sibling, Burden of Dreams, this certainly feels blander. While you still get the sense of how working with Kinski could be a challenge, the way it’s depicted here puts it in a different light. Rather than the sense of walking through a minefield, it is more of a grind – a test of Herzog’s stamina, rather than of his will. Klaus comes over almost as an energy vampire, someone with whom every interaction turns into a draining encounter, with minute details being questioned and every directorial decision being challenged.

From the start, it’s clear that Gruber is firmly on Herzog’s, saying of the director, “I admire his courage, which he constantly demonstrates in his films, how uncompromising he is, and his visionary power.” I guess it’s a good thing that the film admits its biases up front, though in general, I’m more a fan of documentaries that go wherever the story takes one, rather than where the makers come in with a predetermined agenda. Gruber sniffs daintily at the prospect of covering the juicier elements. While acknowledging that the arguments between director and star “dominate the shooting,” Gruber asks himself whether they should become the subject of the movie. He answers himself in the negative: “I resist the temptation. We’re not here to carry out gossip journalism.”

While he’s reluctant to do anything which might paint his hero in even a negative light, there are still scenes of the discussions – shot from a very long way away! “Why do I have to stand there?” demands Klaus, or “Why do I have a rifle?” Werner patiently explains his thinking, in the face of disparaging comments which would try the patience of most people. “I can’t shoot like this! I refuse to work with idiots!” goes Klaus, and continues to mutter darkly, even after the director has gone to take up his position. “What a load of rubbish! We shouldn’t shoot an important scene like this with two cameras!” It’s difficult to think of any other actor and director pairing which seemed to operate in such a state of perpetual tension.

Even Herzog has his breaking point. He tells Gruber, “There’s a final limit for me… When I reach it, then without hesitation, and within seconds, I’ll do things that nobody thinks are possible, and that will affect my life forever.” Though he never provides specifics, I immediately thought about the stories of him pulling a gun on Kinski. Compared to that, Cobra Verde seems to have been a cake-walk, Herzog adding, “I don’t think we’ll reach the limit here.” You do get a sense of why Herzog was prepared to tolerate it. He praises Kinski’s instincts: “He sees absolutely perfectly how physically people get frightened and run away. All at once something is there that has real life. When there’s no life in cinema you shouldn’t make it at all.”

What does come over is Herzog’s weariness of the entire process, but how he feels almost an obligation to make movies, despite the obvious pain the experience causes. “Making films isn’t a good job… You really shouldn’t do it too often.” There are moments where his frustration at the process comes through, such as when the local extras suddenly require double the previously-agreed daily rate, causing Werner to explode: “What you are demanding from me is nothing else but blackmail, and you should know that!” But he has little option except to give in to their demands. Gruber described the director as almost disassociating himself from proceedings: “Herzog acts as if he’s not involved, like a sleepwalker.”

It is more about the film-making operation from the director’s perspective. Kinski, when he appears at all, is often a long way off. About the only extended scene where he’s is the focus sees him goofing off (top) with some of the extras who play his character’s Amazonian army. Though the line between goofing off and sexual harassment of these topless women is probably a complex equation involving time, place and intent. Gruber spends more time talking to the extras than Kinski (the latter being “none at all”), though this is sometimes quite interesting in its own terms. One said her boyfriend thought she was a prostitute, for showing her breasts to white men, and demanded she choose him or the film. She picked the film.

The week before watching this, I listened to the audio commentary for Apocalypse Now, which might be another example of what Gruber here calls “A sort of short-term colonialism.” There are definite parallels: an auteur director, shooting in a foreign country with a talented but problematic star, and often finding the process to be more of a chore than a pleasure. But they both also illustrate the magic of cinema, where what appears to be chaotic disorder can still result in the creator’s vision being realized, when all the elements come together. Watching this, you’ll wonder how Cobra Verde was ever finished, never mind that it provided an appropriate full-stop to the long, memorable sentence which were Herzog’s collaborations with Kinski. But this documentary feels very much like a snapshot of the movie’s creation, rather than the full picture, and so is frustrating in its incompleteness.

Creation is Violent: Anecdotes on Kinski’s Final Years (2021)

Dir: Josh Johnson
Star: Klaus Kinski, Debora Caprioglio, Barry Hickey, Diane Salinger

This documentary covers Kinski’s final years, roughly from 1985 through to his death in 1991, roughly in chronological order. Though it concentrates more on particular project during that time, rather than being a comprehensive overview of the period. There’s very little about the making of Cobra Verde (1987) and not even a mention of Grandi Cacciatori (1988). Instead, there is a wealth of detail about Creature (1985), Revenge of the Stolen Stars (1986), Crawlspace (1986), Vampire in Venice (1988) and Paganini (1989), as well as a final segment where they talk to those who knew Klaus when he lived at his remote mountain chalet in Lagunitas, California. The film was originally released as an extra on the BliuRay release by Severin Films of Vampire, but has now made its way onto a number of streaming services as a stand-alone title.

By the time the final credits roll, it feels refreshingly even-handed, even if there are points while it feels like it’s going to topple over into the “Kinski = madman” category for a bit. There’s no doubt that he was a difficult actor to work with, not least because of his legendary hatred for directors. [I wonder if, having experienced the role himself in Paganini, whether he might have mellowed towards them thereafter? Since it was his final film, we’ll never know] Kinski believed they were almost worthless, particularly in terms of providing instructions to him, which he felt was useless. That was only part of the problem: in every area, from costume to dialogue, he was exacting to a fault, and would brook little or no argument on the topic.

There’s any number of anecdotes here, recounted by those who worked with him, which go to prove the point. Gabe Bartalos, who provided special effects on Crawlspace, tells this control complex applied even to a publicity interview on the set, where Kinski refused to speak directly to the interviewer, but insisted on bringing Gabe along as they meandered around the studio, as a focus for Klaus’s answers. Yet there’s a sense of warmth to Bartalos’s comments about Kinski, acknowledging that his tantrums were born of a passion for his art, and that even his dislike of directors is not entirely without merit. In contrast is the opinion of Stefano Spadoni, the production manager on Paganini, who says bluntly, “Klaus Kinski was the worst work experience of my life. I would never do it again, even under torture.”

Some material may be familiar. Personally, a lot of the stories told by Hickey about his experience on Revenge I had heard and documented when writing about the movie. However, I definitely wish I’d seen this when covering Vampire or Paganini, for the stories go a long way to explaining why the end-product in both cases fall so far short of the work obtained from Kinski by Werner Herzog. For example, Vampire in Venice was supposed to take place during carnivale there: with Kinski unavailable until the summer, the production devoted time and money to shooting footage during the event, a body-double standing in for Klaus, complete with bald head, long fingers and cape. Except, the star rejected entirely that look when he arrived on set, rendering it useless. The reactions of co-stars Donald Pleasence and Christopher Plummer toward Kinski are also interesting: the former basically ignored the on-set chaos, while Plummer took a different approach:

At first he put a lot of effort into the movie since he’s a huge professional. His first scenes were the ones of the duel against Kinski, when Plummer shoots and puts a hole in Kinski’s stomach… When we did rehearsal for that scene, Plummer started saying his lines in front of Kinski. Kinski looked at him in an indifferent way because, as I said, he didn’t want to rehearse. Without saying anything, he took his mirror from his pocket, the one he used every day to check his make-up, took a comb, and started combing his hair while Plummer was saying his lines in front of him. And then he answered him while he was still combing his hair, with the same indifferent look. Plummer was flabbergasted and then he burst into laughter. From that moment on he treated the set like a joke. He no longer cared. One day I asked him, “How is it to act with Kinski?” He said, “Well, they’re paying me so much money that I don’t care.”

Luigi Cozzi, FX on Vampire in Venice

The complex relationship of Kinski and women does get some coverage, though none of the fair sex interviewed here could be accused of “dishing the dirt”. Salinger, his co-star in Creature, may have been making her feature debut, but had clearly been forewarned about his reputation, and describes how she dressed in the least sexy way possible for her first meeting with him – to no avail! Again though, both she and Joycelyne Lew from Revenge don’t appear to hold any particular grudge against him, or have experienced anything they felt was particularly abusive. The same cannot perhaps be said of Vampire‘s Barbara De Rossi. Sound engineer Luciano Muratori says he saw Kinski stick his fingers in her vagina during a shot, an assault which sent the young actress running in tears from the set.

On the other hand, we hear quite a lot from Kinski’s girlfriend of several years, Debora Caprioglio, whom he met on the set of Vampire.when she was 18. She speaks about what drew Klaus to the Paganini project: “Just like him, [Paganini] was genius and disorder.” She was with him through the production in which she co-starred, and beyond, including the tumultuous Cannes press conference [of which we only see a segment sadly, top] where Kinski did not respond well to criticism, shall we say. Of their relationship, she says, “He was a very generous man, very loving, very jealous, even too much. He alternated moments of extreme sweetness and calm with moments of rage… In his private life, in his relationship with me, he was very sweet because he wasn’t irascible. You would think that a man like him, with such a peculiar nature, might have been different, but he always had the greatest respect for our relationship, and he was also very protective.”

It’s this which begins to tile the film back towards balance, and leads into the film’s final section, where we hear from people who interacted with Klaus in his everyday life, such as the man who ran the local post office near his chalet. The two appear to have stuck up an unlikely friendship, Klaus sending postcards back and even inviting him to the premier of Paganini in Paris. We also hear from Sara Ellis, a local mountain biker who was the last person to see Klaus alive, going to his home to look over photographs he had taken of her in action, the night before he died of a heart attack. Their accounts ring true, depicting a complex, troubled performer, who did everything at 110%, yet could take pleasure in little things like using the ‘Return to Sender’ stamp. Don’t expect this documentary to provide any easy answers for such a multi-faceted human being. You may well leave with no better understanding than you had before, yet that’s an undeniable part of Klaus’s fascination.

Burden of Dreams (1982)

Dir: Les Blank
Star: Werner Herzog, Klaus Kinski, Claudia Cardinale, Thomas Mauch

When you get a chance, google “Werner Herzog motivational posters.” It’s a meme which combines quotes from our favorite dour German director, with beautiful images of nature and life. You get the sense this documentary about the making of Fitzcarraldo may have been the source of many. For, while the relationship between Kinski and Herzog was often… Well, let’s go with a severe understatement and say, “somewhat strained,” what you’ll take away from this is that Klaus was hardly the biggest problem, in a film that took almost four years to complete. It’s just horribly fascinating to watch Herzog disintegrate as his dream collapses around him, eventually launching into the following glorious tirade, a defeated man who is both cursing his opponent, and acknowledging its inevitable superiority. [I see I also included it in the Fitzcarraldo review, but make no apology for including it here as well!]

Kinski always says it’s full of erotic elements. I don’t see it so much erotic. I see it more full of obscenity. It’s just – Nature here is vile and base. I wouldn’t see anything erotic here. I would see fornication and asphyxiation and choking and fighting for survival and growing and just rotting away. Of course, there’s a lot of misery. But it is the same misery that is all around us. The trees here are in misery, and the birds are in misery. I don’t think they- they sing. They just screech in pain. It’s an unfinished country. It’s still prehistorical. The only thing that is lacking is the dinosaurs here. It’s like a curse weighing on an entire landscape. And whoever goes too deep into this has his share of that curse. So we are cursed with what we are doing here. It’s a land that God, if he exists, has created in anger.

burdenThis is a project that was certainly cursed from the beginning, and there’s something appropriate about the film’s subject being a man attempting to do something ludicrous and borderline insane – drag a ship over a mountain – because Herzog’s persistence can only be admired. From the get-go, there were issues with the natives,  and the initial location had to be abandoned, with locals burning the camp to the ground as the crew pulled out. Burden also includes footage from the original version, which started filming over a year later with new locations, and starred Jason Robards as Fitzcarraldo, with (of all people) Mick Jagger as his sidekick. After five weeks shooting, almost half the movie was already in the can, when Robards came down with amoebic dysentery and had to return to the United States, where his doctor forbade him from returning. While Herzog tried desperately to find another lead, Jagger had to return to his Rolling Stones related duties, and his character ended up being written out entirely.

As we all know, Herzog found a replacement in Kinski, who came to the Amazon jungle for his fourth collaboration with the director – likely triggering memories of the Aguirre shoot. But, in many ways, Herzog was even more maniacally focused here, and his efforts to ensure “authenticity” are beyond the extrene.  According to Blank, he “admits he could shoot Fitzcarraldo right outside Iquitos,” a reasonably-sized city in the region. Herzog instead chooses a location that’s a full day into the jungle by air, or two weeks by boat – if reachable at all. He claims “the isolated location will bring out special qualities in the actors, and even the film crew, that would be impossible to achieve otherwise.” It’s clear that Herzog has a vision, and nothing is going to be allowed to interfere with this. Frankly, based on this film, Kinski seems like the sane one in their partnership.

While there were reports of tensions between them, Blank doesn’t provide much on this – the film’s cinematographer, Thomas Mauch, appears more fed-up (and also gets his head cracked open while filming the boat going through the Pongo das Mortes, or “Rapids of Death”). Kinski’s main gripe appears to be the long periods of sitting around, resulting from the lengthy delays in production: the weather proved uncooperative, leaving rivers unnavigable and the bulldozer used to help clear a path for the boat over the mountain was bought second-hand, and kept breaking down, requiring parts to be flown in from Miami.  Based on the interview here, it’s the resulting idleness which grated on Klaus’s nerves; curiously, and as hinted at in Herzog’s quote above, Kinski seems to have appreciated the primeval physical location more than most Westerners probably would.

If we would work from the morning to the evening, that’s fine. You have to do something. You have to move, you know. But now we’re just sitting and sitting and sitting around. So you can’t go anywhere. You can’t escape this fucking, stinking camp because you never know when they call you. Because you have to be here because you’re paid for it. You are under contract, so you can’t just go. It means you’re completely captured here. Completely. You go from there to there and from there to there. That’s all that you can do. At least you have this view, instead of something else, and you feel you’re right in the jungle, which is a good feeling, you know.

The main weakness here is likely unavoidable, in that Blank wasn’t there for the finale. It seems he had to leave at a point where completion once again appeared in doubt, with one of the three boats used having run aground and another being stuck at the base of the mountain, all efforts to pull it up having failed. But after the documentarian’s departure, a new engineering crew managed to help Herzog achieve his vision, even if Blank wasn’t there to capture it or Herzog’s reaction. Instead, it ends with the director’s response to being asked what he’d do when filming ends. “I shouldn’t make movies anymore. I should go to a lunatic asylum right away. [It’s] not what a man should do in his life all the time. Even if I get that boat over the mountain and somehow I finish that film, nobody on this earth will convince me to be happy about all that. Not until the end of my days.”

Jesus Christus Erlöser (2008)

Dir: Peter Geyer
Star: Klaus Kinski

“I have come to tell mankind´s most exciting story:  The Story of Jesus Christ.  l’m not talking about that Jesus with jaundiced skin who was made the biggest whore ever by an insane human society that perversely drags his cadaver around on infamous crosses. l´m talking about that adventurer, the freest and most modern of all men, who preferred to be massacred than to rot alive with all the others. l´m talking about a man who is just the way we all want to be. You and me.”

Translating as Jesus Christ, Savior, it’s subtitled An evening with Klaus Kinski, and that is perhaps more a threat than a promise. For this is an 84-minute theatrical car-crash of a live performance from 1971 – but, really, what else would you expect when someone like Kinski sets himself up, by creating an event where he’ll provide his view of Jesus Christ for two hours? The tone is set immediately, as Klaus starts off by describing Christ in the style of a police report, and after saying “Alleged profession: worker,” someone in the crowd shouts out, “But you have never done any work!” It’s not long before things escalate. “I want my 10 Marks back!” yells another spectator, and the flood-gates are open. “Are you here to put on a show or just to amuse the people?” “He is just wanking around!” “You’re at a loss, aren’t you?

You will not be surprised to hear, Kinski does not handle hecklers well. yelling back “Just shut the hell up, so you can hear what I have to say!” and inviting another to “come up here, you with your big mouth.” The audience member is apparently rather braver than I would be, and actually does go on stage, arguing that if people contradicted Christ, “He tried to convince them, he didn’t say, ‘Shut up.'” To which Kinski replies, “No, he took a whip and bashed them in the face! That´s what he did! You stupid pig! And that can happen to you, too!” Yeah, when Kinski later proclaims, “I am not your Superstar,” he isn’t kidding. Klaus Kinski, like the SubGenius Foundation, is with Jesus, the fighting Jesus, not some long-haired mushmouth.

It isn’t long before Kinski storms off the stage, after delivering this parting shot: “There are two possibilities! Either those of you who aren’t part of that riff-raff throw the others out! Or else you spent your money for nothing!” He returns, and starts from the beginning again. He does get further, describing his notion of Christ as someone who was with the outsiders and the hurt, not establishment groups like the church or the Army. “Woe to you who are rich,” Kinski quotes Jesus as saying, “Every inmate and every prostitute is better than you.” But this doesn’t sit well with a crowd who paid Klaus a fair bit of money (probably about the equivalent of twenty bucks each, in today’s money) and the heckling starts up again. Not lost on the crowd is the irony, given Kinski’s attitude, in hearing him preach, “Do unto others as you should have them do unto you,” and “Love your enemies.”

Another audience member takes the stage at this point, and politely inquires, “Mr. Kinski, can I say something?” Klaus gives him that look – y’know, the one delivered to the monkey at the end of Aguirre, which causes the simian to shit itself – and instructs security to kick him off. The man persists – again, showing more courage (or, possibly, stupidity) than I would – but only succeeds in driving Kinski from the stage again, this time declaring,  “If even one person remains who wants to hear this, he’ll have to wait until the fucking riff-raff has left!” While he’s out, a discussion ensues, with Klaus being accused of “fascist methods”, but the counterpoint is made that this is a performance, and “people have no right just to come up on stage.”

erloser2

Klaus takes the stage for a third time, after pleas are made for people “to stop interrupting and provoking Mr. Kinski.” You can guess how well this works, and the non-playful banter continues, as Kinski tells the story of Christ berating a priest for eating without being hungry. “Speak today´s language and not one of 2,000 years ago!” yells a heckler, followed by “We aren’t little kids anymore. We’re enlightened adults!” Another comments, “It’s just like an Edgar Wallace movie or a spaghetti Western,” a pointed reference to Kinski’s large body of work for hire. Klaus’s long pauses also draw derision, with cat-calls of “Forget your lines again?” and an almost Pythonesque, “Get on with it!”, the latter prompting the performer to snarl back venomously, “You’re one of those who nailed him to the cross!”

A subsequent further reference to his movies, “The crime movies are better” also gets the hoped-for (and not very Christian) reaction, “I didn’t make those crime movies for a moron like you, idiot!” That marks the effective end to the meaningful portion of the evening’s entertainment, Kinski flouncing off stage for a third and final time, as chants of “Kinski is a fascist!” are heard [does Godwin’s Law apply in Germany?], an incensed Klaus declaring, “At least they let Jesus speak before they nailed him up.” While Kinski declares the performance over, a couple of hundred hardy souls stick around, down at the front, and are eventually treated to a Kinski Unplugged performance of the text, though even this has its road-bumps: “Can’t you just shut up! lf you can’t understand that, then let someone pound it into your brain with a hammer!” Finally, at 2am, the night concludes.

It’s truly one of those events that must have been utterly memorable to experience in person, with a real sense of danger, and no way of knowing what would happen next. Kinski, who did a number of recordings of great works and spoken-word performances, in his early career, certainly has the gravitas and stage presence to pull it off, but the  problem is the subject matter. It seems too obvious that he is drawing parallels between himself and Christ, which does not go down well with the irreligious and/or atheist crowd members. Combine that with Kinski’s notoriously short fuse, and the results are almost inevitable. He certainly makes some good points about Christ, but as one of the crowd puts it:  “Let me make this quote: ‘You will know me by the deeds I do.’ That’s decisive.” And indeed it is: the chasm between Christ’s words and Kinski’s actions are undeniable, and it’s clear why the proposed world tour never happened.

This was pieced together by Geyer from fragmented footage taken on the night, decades after the event and the camerawork as a result is occasionally ropey. But the power and intensity of Kinski is undeniable, and you can understand what his intended vision of the event was. However, as so often, failure is more interesting than success, and one suspects an uninterrupted performance, in front of the appropriate reverential crowd dreamed of by Klaus, would have given us a good deal less of a glimpse into the true personality of its creator. Below, is a section of the show.